
Most BC business owners assume their brand was protected the day their company name was approved. It was not. A name approval from the BC Registry lets you incorporate. It does not stop a competitor in Kelowna, Calgary or Toronto from using a confusingly similar name, and it does not stop someone else from registering your brand as a trademark first.
Trademark registration in Canada is the step that turns a name or logo into an enforceable, national property right. It is a federal process, handled by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) under the Trademarks Act, and it works very differently from anything a business does with the BC Registry.
This guide explains what registration gives you, what can and cannot be registered, how the legal test for confusion works, what the process costs and how long it takes in 2026, and how a BC business enforces its rights when someone copies its brand.
No. This is the most common and most costly misunderstanding we see.
When you incorporate under the Business Corporations Act (BC), or file a registration statement for a sole proprietorship or partnership under the Partnership Act (BC), the BC Registry checks your proposed name against other BC names. That process exists so the public can identify who they are dealing with. It is not a trademark examination.
A BC name approval or business name registration:
The same is true of a domain name or a social media handle. Each is useful, but none is a trademark right.
Trademarks in Canada are governed by the federal Trademarks Act. There is no separate British Columbia trademark registry, and the same registration rules apply in BC as in every other province.
That has three practical consequences for a BC business:
BC law still matters. Common law claims for passing off are decided under BC law in the BC Supreme Court, and the BC Limitation Act can govern how long you have to bring them.
You can acquire some rights in a brand simply by using it. Those unregistered, or "common law", rights are real. But they are narrow, and they are hard to prove.
A registered trademark gives you:
Without registration, a business generally has to rely on passing off. That requires proving goodwill in the specific area where the dispute arises. A Vancouver restaurant with a strong local reputation may have no practical remedy against a business using the same name in Halifax.
If you sell into Quebec, registration has an additional effect. Since June 1, 2025, amendments under Quebec's Charter of the French Language have narrowed the exception that allows a non-French trademark to appear on products and signage without translation, tying it more closely to marks registered in Canada. The rules are detailed and depend on Quebec law, so a BC business planning to sell in Quebec should get advice on them before launch.
The Trademarks Act defines a "sign" broadly. It includes words, personal names, designs, letters, numerals, colours, three-dimensional shapes, holograms, moving images, sounds, scents, tastes, textures and the positioning of a sign (s. 2).
For most businesses, the choice comes down to two filings.
Where budget allows, many businesses file both. Where it does not, the word mark usually comes first.
Colours, shapes, sounds and similar signs can be registered, but they are harder. The Registrar may require evidence that the sign actually distinguishes your goods or services in the market. A sign whose features are dictated primarily by a utilitarian function is not registrable at all (s. 12(2)).
Section 12(1) of the Trademarks Act sets out the main grounds on which a mark cannot be registered. The ones that affect most businesses are:
There is an important exception. A name or descriptive mark can still be registered if it had become distinctive by the filing date, having regard to all the circumstances, including how long it has been used (s. 12(3)). That usually requires substantial evidence of use and recognition.
In practice, examiners and courts treat marks along a spectrum:
The marketing preference for a name that "says what we do" often pulls directly against registrability. That tension is best resolved before the brand launches, not after.
Confusion is the central question in examination, opposition and infringement. Under section 6(2), a mark is confusing with another if using both in the same area would be likely to lead to the inference that the goods or services come from the same source, whether or not they fall in the same class of the Nice Classification.
Section 6(5) directs the Registrar and the courts to consider all the surrounding circumstances, including:
The Supreme Court of Canada has said the question is assessed from the perspective of the casual consumer somewhat in a hurry, on first impression (Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., 2006 SCC 22; Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin v. Boutiques Cliquot Ltée, 2006 SCC 23). In Masterpiece Inc. v. Alavida Lifestyles Inc., 2011 SCC 27, the Court emphasized that resemblance is often the factor most likely to decide the analysis, and that it is often sensible to consider it first.
Two practical points follow. First, identical class numbers do not decide the question either way. Second, adding a design element or changing one letter rarely avoids confusion if the dominant, most striking part of the mark is the same.
A proper clearance search covers the CIPO register, pending applications, BC and other provincial business name records, domain names and actual marketplace use. Unregistered prior users can still oppose your application under section 16 if they used a confusing mark first.
The application identifies the applicant, the mark and the specific goods and services, grouped by Nice class. Precision matters. Broad or vague descriptions draw objections, and you cannot add new goods or services to a pending application beyond its original scope.
Since June 17, 2019, you do not need to have used the mark before filing or before registration. Entitlement is generally determined as of the earlier of your filing date and your date of first use in Canada (s. 16(1)).
For 2026, CIPO's online filing fee is $491.06 for the first class of goods or services, plus $149.04 for each additional class. Paper filings cost more. Fees are adjusted annually, and professional fees for searching, drafting and responding to objections are separate.
CIPO has substantially reduced its examination backlog. Its forecast for applications filed in spring 2026 was roughly seven to eight months to first examination, compared with waits of several years in 2023 and 2024. CIPO ended its accelerated examination stream in 2025, so most applications now join a single queue.
The examiner may issue a report raising objections, such as descriptiveness, confusion with an existing mark or an unclear statement of goods and services. A well-reasoned response, an amendment or evidence of acquired distinctiveness can often resolve them.
Once approved, the application is advertised in the Trademarks Journal. Any person may then file a statement of opposition, generally within two months of advertisement (s. 38). Grounds include non-registrability, prior entitlement, lack of distinctiveness and bad faith in filing the application.
If there is no opposition, or the applicant succeeds, the Registrar registers the mark (s. 40). A registration lasts 10 years and can be renewed for further 10-year periods (s. 46). In 2026, online renewal costs $595.06 for the first class and $185.49 for each additional class.
An unopposed application that draws no objections can now reach registration within roughly a year of filing. Objections or an opposition can extend that considerably.
Removing the use requirement for registration in 2019 did not remove the importance of use. Several provisions work together to discourage registering marks you have no real plan to use.
The 2025 amendments also gave the Registrar power to award costs in opposition and section 45 proceedings (ss. 38.1 and 45(4.1)). Costs are limited to exceptional circumstances, such as unreasonable conduct causing undue delay or expense, but they add a new consequence to tactical filings.
Ownership is where many BC businesses create problems they discover only during a sale, a financing or a falling-out between founders.
Most disputes begin with a demand letter, and many end there. Before sending one, confirm your own registration, your evidence of use and the other party's history. An aggressive letter based on a weak or unused registration can invite a section 45 proceeding or an expungement application in response.
The Trademarks Act allows claims for infringement and other relief to be brought in the Federal Court or in the superior court of a province (ss. 52, 53.2 and 55). For a BC business, that means a choice between the Federal Court and the Supreme Court of British Columbia, which proceeds under the Supreme Court Civil Rules.
The choice matters:
Available remedies include injunctions, damages or an accounting of profits, punitive damages and the destruction of offending goods and materials (s. 53.2(1)). Interlocutory injunctions are assessed under the three-part test from RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 SCR 311: a serious question to be tried, irreparable harm, and the balance of convenience.
Where a mark is not registered, or a claim goes beyond the registration, the main tool is passing off. It exists both at common law and in statutory form under section 7(b) of the Trademarks Act. The Supreme Court of Canada has identified three elements: goodwill, a misrepresentation that creates confusion in the public, and actual or potential damage (Ciba-Geigy Canada Ltd. v. Apotex Inc., [1992] 3 SCR 120; Kirkbi AG v. Ritvik Holdings Inc., 2005 SCC 65).
Proving goodwill is the hard part. It requires evidence of reputation among actual customers in the relevant area, which is exactly the burden a registration removes.
Common law claims brought in the BC Supreme Court are generally subject to the two-year basic limitation period in the BC Limitation Act, running from discovery. The limitation analysis for statutory Trademarks Act claims is more complex. It can depend on where the cause of action arose and on whether the infringement is continuing. Opposition deadlines at CIPO are measured in weeks. In every case, delay can also weaken a request for an injunction.
A Canadian registration protects you in Canada only. If you plan to sell abroad, Canada has been part of the Madrid Protocol since June 17, 2019, which allows a single international application, based on a Canadian application or registration, to designate many other member countries. Each designated country then examines the mark under its own law.
Domain names follow their own rules. Disputes over .ca domain names are generally resolved under the Canadian Internet Registration Authority's dispute resolution policy, where a registered trademark is strong evidence of rights.
No, but unregistered rights are limited. Without registration, you generally rely on passing off and must prove goodwill in the area where the dispute arises. A registration gives a national exclusive right for the registered goods and services under section 19 of the Trademarks Act.
No. BC Registry name approval allows you to incorporate or register a business name. It does not give you trademark rights, does not extend beyond BC, and does not prevent someone else from registering a confusing trademark with CIPO.
CIPO's forecast for applications filed in 2026 was about seven to eight months to first examination. An unopposed application without objections can be registered within about a year. Government fees in 2026 are $491.06 online for the first class and $149.04 for each additional class, plus professional fees.
You can file a single application for a logo that includes your name, but that registration protects the combination as shown. A separate word mark application protects the name regardless of style. Many businesses file both.
The answer depends on the strength of each mark, the goods and services, the history of use and whether the other registration is being used. Options can include coexistence agreements, a section 45 non-use proceeding, opposition or an expungement application in the Federal Court. It is worth getting advice before you rebrand or respond to a demand letter.
Canadian law does not require you to mark a registered trademark. Using ® on a mark that is not registered in Canada can mislead the public and is best avoided. The ™ symbol may be used with unregistered marks.
Trademark registration in Canada is one of the least expensive ways to protect one of a business's most valuable assets. The cost of clearing and registering a brand is modest compared with the cost of rebranding after a dispute, or of proving goodwill in court without a registration.
The businesses that run into difficulty are rarely the ones that registered too early. They are the ones that assumed their BC company name was enough, chose a descriptive brand that could not be protected, or left ownership with a founder or designer.
If you are launching a brand, planning to expand outside BC, or dealing with a competitor using a similar name, speak with our Tech law team about clearing, registering and enforcing your trademarks.
Informational Purposes Only
This article is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It does not create a solicitor-client relationship. Commercial leasing disputes are highly fact-specific, and the law may have changed since publication. You should consult a qualified BC commercial real estate lawyer before taking any steps to assign, sublet, or otherwise transfer your commercial lease.